A draft genome was constructed with greater than 10X coverage of the
A. migulance strain FA2B. The resulting genome was screened against Bagel4, bactibase, and antiSMASH to identify potential bacteriocins. This analysis identified 5 genes of interest that included 3 bacteriocin genes, one terpene and one T3PKS. These five genes were identified as potential candidates for inhibiting
S. bovis. As such, CRISPR-Cas9 was utilized to KO all five genes, individually, to facilitate the identification of which gene or gene combination was needed to inhibit
S. bovis. A wild type (WT) pure culture of
A. migulance strain, FA2B, was grown and used to KO each using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Resulting data identified 40 FA2B KOs for
Bacteriocin1. All KO isolates picked were unable to inhibit
S. bovis. However, FA2B KOs for the terpene gene, Bacteriocin 2 & 3, and for the T3PKS gene, were able to inhibit S. bovis, confirming that the gene
Bacteriocin1 was the gene responsible for antibacterial activity of
A. migulance strain FA2B against
S. bovis. To confirm
Bacteriocin1 was KO from FA2B in the mutants, PCR assays were used against
Bacteriocin1 using gene specific primers. A PCR assay targeting
Bacteriocin1 gene sequence confirmed FA2B-
Bacteriocin1 KO mutants to no longer carry an active
Bacteriocin1 gene. However, the FA2B-WT strain showed a positive PCR result for the
Bacteriocin1 gene. Additionally, specific primers designed upstream and downstream of the CRISPR target site were used on both the FA2B-WT and FA2B-
Bacteriocin1 mutants to further ensure disruption of
Bacteriocin1 gene in the mutants. Random transposon mutagenesis was utilized to insert the identified
Bacteriocin1 gene into a GRAS-approved strain of
B. pumilus (11E). A total of 2,206 colonies of the
B. pumilus (11E) mutants were picked and screened against
S. bovis. Out of all the isolates, 122 isolates inhibited
S. bovis and contained a functional gene copy of
Bacteriocin1 that could inhibit
S. bovis. Gene specific primers against
Bacteriocin1 gene was used to identify that the gene has been inserted into the
B. pumilus (11E) genome. The wild type
B. pumilus (11E) was unable to amplify the
Bacteriocin1 gene as such amplifying the bacteriocin gene from the mutants after transposon mutagenesis confirms the insertion of the gene to the
B. pumilus (11E) strain.
Implications
This is one of the first studies utilizing gene editing techniques to develop novel probiotics for animal agriculture. In future studies this strain can be further modified using pH induced promoters to increase bacteriocin production that would lead to better protection under acidotic conditions and to reduce or control acidosis by responding to environmental cues. At present the location where the
Bacteriocin1 gene was inserted in the
B. pumilus genome has not yet been identified. Currently, whole genome sequencing is under way to identify the location of insertion. This study is the first step towards developing engineered DFMs to increase animal health and performance. Similar strategies can be used to develop DFMs that respond to environmental cues to increase the therapeutic potential of the microbiome.